Limits to sustainable animal consumption: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 27: Line 27:
==Fishing==
==Fishing==
Wild-caught fish could provide 5 or 6 grams/day of protein per capita globally, if none of it was wasted.
Wild-caught fish could provide 5 or 6 grams/day of protein per capita globally, if none of it was wasted.
 
<tab name="See maths">
{{dp
{{dp
|<nowiki>seafood.production.wild</nowiki>
|<nowiki>seafood.production.wild</nowiki>
|<nowiki>93 million tonnes/year</nowiki>
|<nowiki>93 million tonnes/year</nowiki>
|<nowiki>Global production of wild-caught fish and other seafood (not farmed)</nowiki>
|<nowiki>Global production of wild-caught fish and other seafood (not farmed)</nowiki>
|<nowiki>Using most recent data available.</nowiki><br /><nowiki>
|<nowiki>Includes bones.</nowiki><br /><nowiki>
Using most recent data available.</nowiki><br /><nowiki>
Fishing grew a lot from 1960 to 1990 but (unlike fish farming) has not increased since 1995. This suggests that we've reached the ecological limit.</nowiki><br /><nowiki>
Fishing grew a lot from 1960 to 1990 but (unlike fish farming) has not increased since 1995. This suggests that we've reached the ecological limit.</nowiki><br /><nowiki>
</nowiki><br /><nowiki>
</nowiki><br /><nowiki>
Line 60: Line 61:
|<nowiki>(g/day per capita)(world.population)</nowiki>
|<nowiki>(g/day per capita)(world.population)</nowiki>
}}
}}
 
</tab>
The sustainable level of consumption might be a bit less than this, because [[overfishing]] is still an issue.
The sustainable level of consumption might be a bit less than this, because [[overfishing]] is still an issue.


The rest of fish is farmed, which, as mentioned earlier, is a net loss of protein. Farmed fish are fed food crops that humans could otherwise eat.
The rest of fish is farmed, which, as mentioned earlier, is a net loss of protein. Farmed fish are fed food crops that humans could otherwise eat.