Draft:Solutions summary 1: Difference between revisions

(Removed the links wikitext for now, but i rly need to find a way to make it compatible with Levels)
(Trying new indentation for emphasis)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<pre class="levels">
<pre class="levels">
Most of the world's energy today comes from fossil fuels. To change this, the following tech is needed:
  Most of the world's energy today comes from fossil fuels.
Energy storage, especially
To really phase out all fossil fuel energy, the following tech is needed:
  Sodium-ion batteries
  Energy storage, especially...
      Reason: Because lithium-ion is lithium-ion#battery minerals|too mineral-intensive to scale up.
Sodium-ion batteries
  To be used for mid-range electric vehicles and smoothing out the day-night cycle of solar panels.
    Reason: Because lithium-ion is too mineral-intensive to scale up.
  They don't even have to be as energy dense as lithium-ion.
To be used for mid-range electric vehicles and smoothing out the day-night cycle of solar panels.
Energy sources - some combination of
They don't even have to be as energy dense as lithium-ion.
  Solar panels without scarce minerals
      Reason: Most of today's solar panels on the market are solar panel minerals|too mineral-intensive to scale up.
  To be installed on as many rooftop solar|rooftops as possible.
      This could provide enough "general-purpose" electricity for homes, buildings and EVs, but not enough for heating in cold parts of the world.
  Wind turbines
  Mostly for producing hydrogen gas
    Can later be burned for heating buildings and in hydrogen combustion vehicles|vehicles
        Fuel cell vehicles are too platinum/palladium-intensive to scale up, but hydrogen production hydrogen gas#platinum-group metals|is not.
  During local windy seasons, can also be used for electricity directly.
  Thorium power
    Note that other forms of nuclear are not viable to scale up
      Conventional nuclear power uses too much uranium-235 (too scarce)
      Uranium-238 breeder reactors have too many weapons proliferation concerns
      Nuclear fusion probably won't be viable soon enough, even though it'll ultimately be the best option in the distant future.


Until the above tech is ready, developed countries must reduce energy demand - most effectively by...
    Energy sources - some combination of
Driving less
Solar panels without scarce minerals
    Reason: Most of today's solar panels on the market are too mineral-intensive to scale up.
To be installed on as many rooftops as possible.
This could provide enough "general-purpose" electricity for homes, buildings and EVs, but not enough for heating in cold parts of the world.
Wind turbines
Mostly for producing hydrogen gas
  Can later be burned for heating buildings and in combustion vehicles
        Fuel cell vehicles are too platinum/palladium-intensive to scale up, but hydrogen production is not.
  During local windy seasons, can also be used for electricity directly.
Thorium power
  Note that other forms of nuclear are not viable to scale up
    Conventional nuclear power uses too much uranium-235 (too scarce)
    Uranium-238 breeder reactors have too many weapons proliferation concerns
    Nuclear fusion probably won't be viable soon enough, even though it'll ultimately be the best option in the distant future.
 
Until the above tech is ready, developed countries must reduce energy demand - most effectively by...
Driving less
   Individual action: Walk, bike, or use public transit.
   Individual action: Walk, bike, or use public transit.
   Collective action: Making neighborhoods more walkabile and improving public transit.
   Collective action: Making neighborhoods more walkabile and improving public transit.
Buying less new "stuff"
Buying less new "stuff"
   Individual action: Frugalism
   Individual action: Frugalism
   Collective action: Fight against planned obsolescence
   Collective action: Fight against planned obsolescence
Yes, these actions would have the most impact - see :File:energy-demand-pie1.png|this pie chart.


Note that climate change isn't the ''only'' major environmental problem. There's also habitat loss. The most effective way to stop this is via food:
Yes, these actions would have the most impact - see this pie chart :File:energy-demand-pie1.png.
 
  Note that climate change isn't the ''only'' major environmental problem. There's also habitat loss. The most effective way to stop this is via food:
     Reason: Because agriculture uses more land than any other human activity.
     Reason: Because agriculture uses more land than any other human activity.
Stop food waste
Stop food waste
   (both personal ''and'' business food waste)
   (both personal ''and'' business food waste)
Make food more plant-based
Make food more plant-based
   (both personal choices ''and'' systemic changes make a difference here)
   (both personal choices ''and'' systemic changes make a difference here)
  Yes, these actions make the biggest difference, both for the environment and for ending global hunger.
  Yes, these actions make the biggest difference, both for the environment and for ending global hunger.
</pre>
</pre>

Latest revision as of 01:54, 24 December 2023

   Most of the world's energy today comes from fossil fuels.
 To really phase out all fossil fuel energy, the following tech is needed:
   Energy storage, especially...
Sodium-ion batteries
     Reason: Because lithium-ion is too mineral-intensive to scale up.
 To be used for mid-range electric vehicles and smoothing out the day-night cycle of solar panels.
 They don't even have to be as energy dense as lithium-ion.

     Energy sources - some combination of
Solar panels without scarce minerals
    Reason: Most of today's solar panels on the market are too mineral-intensive to scale up.
 To be installed on as many rooftops as possible.
 This could provide enough "general-purpose" electricity for homes, buildings and EVs, but not enough for heating in cold parts of the world.
Wind turbines
 Mostly for producing hydrogen gas
  Can later be burned for heating buildings and in combustion vehicles
        Fuel cell vehicles are too platinum/palladium-intensive to scale up, but hydrogen production is not.
  During local windy seasons, can also be used for electricity directly.
Thorium power
   Note that other forms of nuclear are not viable to scale up
    Conventional nuclear power uses too much uranium-235 (too scarce)
    Uranium-238 breeder reactors have too many weapons proliferation concerns
    Nuclear fusion probably won't be viable soon enough, even though it'll ultimately be the best option in the distant future.

 Until the above tech is ready, developed countries must reduce energy demand - most effectively by...
Driving less
  Individual action: Walk, bike, or use public transit.
  Collective action: Making neighborhoods more walkabile and improving public transit.
Buying less new "stuff"
  Individual action: Frugalism
  Collective action: Fight against planned obsolescence

 Yes, these actions would have the most impact - see this pie chart :File:energy-demand-pie1.png.

  Note that climate change isn't the ''only'' major environmental problem. There's also habitat loss. The most effective way to stop this is via food:
    Reason: Because agriculture uses more land than any other human activity.
Stop food waste
  (both personal ''and'' business food waste)
Make food more plant-based
  (both personal choices ''and'' systemic changes make a difference here)

 Yes, these actions make the biggest difference, both for the environment and for ending global hunger.