Energy/faq: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Created page with "thumb|Inequality of environmental footprint '''Myth:''' "Your carbon footprint doesn't matter, because the billionaires are responsible for most of global emissions anyway." '''Fact:''' * The richest '''10% of the world''' is responsible for half of global emissions. ** If you're middle-class in a developed country, '''you are ''part of''''' this 10%. * Corporate emissions are a function of what people buy. * Wealth inequality is more ex...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 5: Line 5:
'''Fact:'''
'''Fact:'''
* The richest '''10% of the world''' is responsible for half of global emissions.
* The richest '''10% of the world''' is responsible for half of global emissions.
** If you're middle-class in a developed country, '''you are ''part of''''' this 10%.
* If you're middle-class in a developed country, '''you are ''part of''''' this 10%.
<tab name="(more details)" collapsed>
* Corporate emissions are a function of what people buy.
* Corporate emissions are a function of what people buy.
* Wealth inequality is more extreme than carbon inequality. {{x|For example, an ultra rich person who earns 100x more money than average, probably emits about 10x more carbon than average.{{cn}}}}
* Wealth inequality is more extreme than carbon inequality. {{x|For example, an ultra rich person who earns 100x more money than average, probably emits about 10x more carbon than average.{{cn}}}}
** "Private jets are responsible for around 4% of all aviation emissions" <ref>[https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/jul/21/kylie-jenner-short-private-jet-flights-super-rich-climate-crisis A 17-minute flight? The super-rich who have 'absolute ...]</ref>
** "Private jets are responsible for around 4% of all aviation emissions" <ref>[https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/jul/21/kylie-jenner-short-private-jet-flights-super-rich-climate-crisis A 17-minute flight? The super-rich who have 'absolute ...]</ref>
* Rich people do still have outrageous carbon footprints. We are IN NO WAY trying to justify their lifestyles. They have to consume less.
* Rich people do still have outrageous carbon footprints. We are IN NO WAY trying to justify their lifestyles. They have to consume less.
* Poor people don't usually have high carbon footprints. We are IN NO WAY trying to tell people who suffer from poverty to consume less. The poorest 50% percent of the world is responsible for only 10% of global emissions.
* Poor people don't usually have high carbon footprints. We are IN NO WAY trying to tell people who suffer from poverty to consume less.
** The poorest 50% percent of the world is responsible for only 10% of global emissions.
</tab>




Line 17: Line 20:
'''Fact:'''
'''Fact:'''
* The poorest 50% percent of the world is responsible for only 10% of global emissions.
* The poorest 50% percent of the world is responsible for only 10% of global emissions.
* There would be more than enough food to feed everyone sustainably, if we didn't waste as much food or raise as many farm animals(which eat grains etc).
* Earth could easily [[food|feed 8 billion people]] or more, if there wasn't so much [[food waste]] & [[animal agriculture]].


==References==
==References==
<references />
<references />