Primitivism: Difference between revisions

From the change wiki
(Created page with "The idea that we can return to hunter-gatherer societies (or abandon technology in general), is probably '''not''' sustainable, not green, and not viable for our global population of nearly 8 billion people. Here's some evidence why: # Hunter-gatherer societies existed when the global population was less than 1/10th of what it is today. # Agriculture was invented because it was more productive (per unit of land) than hunting/gathering. # Today, hunting & fishing restrict...")
 
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
# Agriculture was invented because it was more productive (per unit of land) than hunting/gathering.
# Agriculture was invented because it was more productive (per unit of land) than hunting/gathering.
# Today, hunting & fishing restrictions are needed to prevent animal extinctions from over-hunting and over-fishing.
# Today, hunting & fishing restrictions are needed to prevent animal extinctions from over-hunting and over-fishing.
# Indiginous people {{x|or more specifically, people who get most of their food from hunting, foraging and fishing}} are less than 5% of the global population.
# Indiginous people {{x|or more specifically, people who get the majority of their food from hunting, foraging and fishing; most of whom are indiginous}} are less than 5% of the global population.
All of this points to one likely truth: It takes too much land to feed a person via hunting, fishing and/or foraging. Agriculture {{x|which doesn't have to be monoculture}} is the only way to feed {{x|generate enough food for}} today's global population.
All of this points to one likely truth: It takes too much land to feed a person via hunting, fishing and/or foraging. Agriculture {{x|which doesn't have to be monoculture}} is the only way to feed {{x|generate enough food for}} today's global population.



Revision as of 19:37, 24 May 2022

The idea that we can return to hunter-gatherer societies (or abandon technology in general), is probably not sustainable, not green, and not viable for our global population of nearly 8 billion people. Here's some evidence why:

  1. Hunter-gatherer societies existed when the global population was less than 1/10th of what it is today.
  2. Agriculture was invented because it was more productive (per unit of land) than hunting/gathering.
  3. Today, hunting & fishing restrictions are needed to prevent animal extinctions from over-hunting and over-fishing.
  4. Indiginous people (...)( or more specifically, people who get the majority of their food from hunting, foraging and fishing; most of whom are indiginous ) are less than 5% of the global population.

All of this points to one likely truth: It takes too much land to feed a person via hunting, fishing and/or foraging. Agriculture (...)( which doesn't have to be monoculture ) is the only way to feed (...)( generate enough food for ) today's global population.

Got evidence to the contrary? Join the discussion.

See also