Solar panel minerals: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 20: Line 20:
|-
|-
|Copper
|Copper
|4990 g/m<sup>2</sup> <ref>Calculated from the statistic that there are 5.5 tons of copper for every megawatt(peak) of solar.<br />https://www.copper.org/environment/sustainable-energy/pdf/CDA-Solar-Infographic.pdf</ref>
|4990 g/m<sup>2</sup> <ref>Calculated from the statistic that there are 5.5 tons of copper for every megawatt(peak) of solar.<br />https://www.copper.org/environment/sustainable-energy/pdf/CDA-Solar-Infographic.pdf</ref><!--
 
TALK:
  This is actually an underestimate. I think I forgot to factor in the efficiency of the solar panels. The real calculation should look like:
  {{calc
  | solar_panel.rq_copper_by_peak_power / sunlight_peak / solar_panel.efficiency
  | g/m^2
  | copper_by_area
  }}
  {{calc
  | copper_by_area * rooftop_area
  | % copper.reserves
  }}
  Results are 29350 g/m^2 and 1265% of global reserves!!!
  Then again, if it turns out I misunderstood the original stat (maybe the source meant to say 5.5 tons of copper per AVERAGED megawatt???) then the result would be closer to what it is now.
 
But all this brings us to another point:
  REFACTOR?: Maybe a lot more of this page should be refactored into the calculator format. But I still want to combine it nicely with the existing table format.
  Option 1: Think of a simple writing style that integrates both.
  Option 2: Code up a whole new system that integrates both. It would act almost like a spreadsheet! First I should write up a new wikipage outlining the requirements, and use-cases (i.e. examples of wikipages that would benefit from it).
  Note: In either case, for this page, if I go with this refactor: Keep all the identifiers short: Don't include the prefix "solar_panel.rq_..."
  Additional benefit of refactoring: gets rid of the numbered references - avoids distracting the reader from the numbers we actually care about.
-->
|215% <ref>Copper reserves: 870,000,000 tonnes<br />USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 2021</ref>
|215% <ref>Copper reserves: 870,000,000 tonnes<br />USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 2021</ref>
|-
|-
|Silver
|Silver
|0.82 g/m<sup>2</sup> <ref>Grandell, Leena & Thorenz, Andrea, 2014. "Silver supply risk analysis for the solar sector," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 157-165.<br />Quote: <q>"This estimate is based on a very low silver content (0.82 g/m^2), which already reflects a technical approach to reduce silver consumption, such as the 'wrap through technology' or substitution of silver with copper, both of which are currently in development stage."</q><br />Note: Since the article is from 2014, maybe lower-silver options are available now. Also, the article doesn't really specify which solar panel technologies use this amount of silver.</ref>
|0.82 g/m<sup>2</sup> <ref>Grandell, Leena & Thorenz, Andrea, 2014. "Silver supply risk analysis for the solar sector," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 157-165.<br />Quote: <q>"This estimate is based on a very low silver content (0.82 g/m^2), which already reflects a technical approach to reduce silver consumption, such as the 'wrap through technology' or substitution of silver with copper, both of which are currently in development stage."</q><br /><small>{{light|Note: Since the article is from 2014, maybe lower-silver options are available now. Also, the article doesn't really specify which solar panel technologies use this amount of silver.}}</small></ref>
|62% <ref>Silver reserves: 500,000 tonnes<br />https://www.statista.com/statistics/1114842/global-silver-reserves/</ref>
|62% <ref>Silver reserves: 500,000 tonnes<br />https://www.statista.com/statistics/1114842/global-silver-reserves/</ref>
|}
|}