1,956
edits
Talk:Minimal consumption scenario: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Emphasis on globalness== | ==Emphasis on globalness== | ||
This isn't just about "how can westerners reduce their consumption | This isn't just about "how can westerners reduce their consumption", it's also about "how can other countries develop sustainably". | ||
So for the analysis, we want to estimate the resources that would be needed if this scenario were to happen ''globally''. Compare it to the global status quo (extreme inequality). | So for the analysis, we want to estimate the resources that would be needed if this scenario were to happen ''globally''. Compare it to the global status-quo (extreme inequality). | ||
Is it easy for people to see that that's the | Is it easy for people to see that that's the intended analysis? Or should the bottom section be rephrased? | ||
[[User:Elie|Elie]] ([[User talk:Elie|talk]]) 22:54, 24 May 2022 (EDT) | [[User:Elie|Elie]] ([[User talk:Elie|talk]]) 22:54, 24 May 2022 (EDT) | ||
==Bar graph approach== | |||
Maybe use [[File:energy-demand-status-quo.png]] with labels of "this section can be dealt with by..."? Or use that idea on other pages - for example [[walkability]] would say "this page deals with 'road vehicles - passenger'. See other pages to deal with other sections of this bar graph" idk<br />[[User:Elie|Elie]] ([[User talk:Elie|talk]]) 00:42, 29 May 2022 (EDT) | |||