Wiki for a better world:Writing style: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* Original research is welcome here. | * Original research is welcome here. | ||
* Things should be straight-to-the-point, and easy to skim through. {{x|We welcome as much detail & nuance as Wikipedia, but it should be tucked away neatly into expandables and subpages.}} | * Things should be straight-to-the-point, and easy to skim through. {{x|We welcome as much detail & nuance as Wikipedia, but it should be tucked away neatly into expandables and subpages.}} | ||
* Not only ''descriptive'', but also ''perscriptive''. {{x|Unlike other wikis that mostly just "tell it like it is", this wiki is a place to bring together ideas to reach consensus on what ''could'' - or even ''should'' be.}} | |||
* The main purpose is to inform people & organizations how to make the world better. | * The main purpose is to inform people & organizations how to make the world better. | ||
Latest revision as of 08:32, 11 January 2024
This is not Wikipedia.
- Not everything has to be formal.
(...)( We highly value logical problem-solving and academic thought. But we try to avoid pedantic intros - they tend to derail conversations and lose the audience. Also, we're not afraid to break grammar rules, if it gets the point across more clearly. ) - Original research is welcome here.
- Things should be straight-to-the-point, and easy to skim through.
(...)( We welcome as much detail & nuance as Wikipedia, but it should be tucked away neatly into expandables and subpages. ) - Not only descriptive, but also perscriptive.
(...)( Unlike other wikis that mostly just "tell it like it is", this wiki is a place to bring together ideas to reach consensus on what could - or even should be. ) - The main purpose is to inform people & organizations how to make the world better.