Wind power: Difference between revisions

447 bytes added ,  22 November 2023
no edit summary
m (Elie moved page Wind to Wind power over redirect)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
Wind turbines convert wind to electricity.
Wind turbines convert wind to electricity.


{{minor|A lot of people incorrectly call wind turbines "windmills". But in fact windmills are a much older technology, which use the wind to mill grains ''mechanically'' (no electricity involved).}}
{{minor|Side note: A lot of people incorrectly call wind turbines "windmills". But in fact windmills are a much older technology, which use the wind to mill grains ''mechanically'' (no electricity involved).}}


==Considerations==
{{considerations}}__NOTOC__ <!-- The above table replaces ''most'' of the table of contents. -->
{|class="wikitable"
 
|[[#Intermittency]]
==Intermittency==
|Needs [[energy storage]]
{{sum|Needs [[energy storage]]}}
|-
|[[#Geography]]
|Major limitation
|-
|[[#Rare earth magnets]]
|{{rn}}
|-
|[[#Cement]]
|{{gcell}}Not a significant problem
|-
|[[#EROI]]
|{{gcell}}Manageable
|-
|[[#Land use]]
|{{gcell}}Manageable
|-
|[[#Noise]]
|{{rn}}
|-
|[[#Recyclability]]
|{{rn}}
|}
__NOTOC__ <!-- The above table replaces ''most'' of the table of contents. -->
===Intermittency===


Wind power is even more intermittent than [[solar]]. There can be months where the wind blows strongly, and months where it barely blows at all. Also, wind turbines can't function when the wind blows ''too'' hard.
Wind power is even more intermittent than [[solar]]. There can be months where the wind blows strongly, and months where it barely blows at all. Also, wind turbines can't function when the wind blows ''too'' hard.
Line 52: Line 28:
Scaling up [[energy storage]] is already a challenge, even for solar which only needs about a day's worth of energy storage in general. Wind might need several weeks worth{{x|i.e. could easily need 40 times more battery capacity for the same ''average'' energy consumption rate}}.
Scaling up [[energy storage]] is already a challenge, even for solar which only needs about a day's worth of energy storage in general. Wind might need several weeks worth{{x|i.e. could easily need 40 times more battery capacity for the same ''average'' energy consumption rate}}.


Maybe wind energy could be stored via [[hydrogen]], which doesn't have a ''fixed capacity'' the way batteries do. {{x|A battery can only store a fixed amount of energy at any given time. But hydrogen could be produced and stockpiled if necessary (as long as [[hydrogen gas/safety|safety]] concerns are addressed). Hydrogen production units (electrolyzers) still have a fixed ''power'' rating: There's a limit to how much hydrogen can be produced ''per unit of time''.}} [[wind/hydrogen|This has its own challenges.]]
Wind energy is probably best stored via [[hydrogen gas]], which doesn't have a ''fixed capacity'' the way batteries do. {{x|A battery can only store a fixed amount of energy at any given time. But hydrogen could be produced and stockpiled if necessary (as long as [[hydrogen gas/safety|safety]] concerns are addressed). Hydrogen production units (electrolyzers) still have a fixed ''power'' rating: There's a limit to how much hydrogen can be produced ''per unit of time''.}}


===Geography===
==Geography==
{{sum|Limitation}}


The best places for wind turbines [[/Geography|aren't usually near where people live]]. In most cases, the distance is far enough that power lines wouldn't even be viable. {{qn}}
The best places for wind turbines [[/Geography|aren't usually near where people live]]. In most cases, the distance is far enough that power lines wouldn't even be viable. {{qn}}


This might not be an issue if [[wind/hydrogen]] (as described above) is the main solution. Instead of power lines, the wind turbines would generate [[hydrogen gas]] which would be [[hydrogen transport|transported]] and used for [[energy]] elsewhere.
This might not be an issue if hydrogen (as described above) is the main solution for the [[energy storage]]. Instead of power lines, the wind turbines would generate [[hydrogen gas]] which would be [[transportation of hydrogen gas|transported]] and used for [[energy]] elsewhere.


We'd need to estimate the full [[EROI]] of such a system, to make sure it's [[Term:viable|viable]].{{rn}}
We'd need to estimate the full [[EROI]] of such a system, to make sure it's [[Term:viable|viable]].{{rn}}


===Rare earth magnets===
==Rare earth magnets==
To build a wind turbine{{x|specifically, the ''dynamo'' component which converts spinning motion into electricity}}requires either ''strong magnets'' (made with rare earth metals{{qn}}) or a complex gearbox (which requires maintenance{{qn| - labor}}and isn't suited for offshore wind).
{{sum|Probably reasonable{{rn}} }}
 
To build a wind turbine{{x|specifically, the ''dynamo'' component which converts spinning motion into electricity}}requires either:
* ''strong magnets'', made with rare earth metals{{qn}}
* or a complex gearbox, which requires maintenance{{qn| - labor}}and isn't suited for offshore wind.


{{pn|This section needs more research to determine which rare metals are needed, in what quantities, and whether there would be enough global [[mineral reserves]] to scale up wind power enough to replace fossil fuels or not.}}
{{pn|This section needs more research to determine which rare metals are needed, in what quantities, and whether there would be enough global [[mineral reserves]] to scale up wind power enough to replace fossil fuels or not.}}
Line 74: Line 55:
-->
-->


===Cement===
==Cement==
{{sum|Reasonable}}
 
The footing of a wind turbine requires a lot of concrete - a potential concern because cement production releases CO<sub>2</sub>. However, it turns out that the amount of CO<sub>2</sub> is '''not''' very significant:
The footing of a wind turbine requires a lot of concrete - a potential concern because cement production releases CO<sub>2</sub>. However, it turns out that the amount of CO<sub>2</sub> is '''not''' very significant:


Line 123: Line 106:
}}
}}
{{calc
{{calc
|<nowiki>wind.rq_concrete * concrete.cement_by_mass * cement.ghg_by_mass / wind.capacity_factor</nowiki>
|<nowiki>wind.rq_concrete / wind.capacity_factor * concrete.cement_by_mass * cement.ghg_by_mass</nowiki>
|<nowiki>days gasoline.ghg_by_energy</nowiki>
|<nowiki>days gasoline.ghg_by_energy</nowiki>
}}
}}
</tab>
</tab>


Compared to burning gasoline{{x|for the same amount of energy per unit of time}}, a wind turbine's cement footprint "pays itself off" in just under 20 days.
A wind turbine's cement CO<sub>2</sub> footprint "pays itself off" in about 20 days, when you compare the wind power with the fossil fuels it would typically replace. {{x|Note that this equation compares [[Term:primary|primary]]-energy from wind (intermittent electricity) with [[Term:primary|primary]]-energy from gasoline (which is a sort of "average" fossil fuel in terms of carbon-per-energy; coal has a bit more carbon while natural gas has a bit less, but they're [[:File:fossil-fuels-ghg-by-energy.png|close enough]] for the purpose of this estimate). Additional energy losses in coal or natural gas power plants would mean that the wind turbine cement CO<sub>2</sub> pays itself off even sooner. }}


<small>This is pretty reasonable considering that a wind turbine's lifespan is about 20 ''years''.<ref>United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) - [https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=P100IL8K.TXT Renewable Energy Fact Sheet: Wind Turbines - epa nepis]</ref></small>
<small>This is pretty reasonable considering that a wind turbine's lifespan is about 20 ''years''.<ref>United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) - [https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=P100IL8K.TXT Renewable Energy Fact Sheet: Wind Turbines - epa nepis]</ref></small>


===EROI===
==E.R.O.I.==
[[Energy return on investment]]: About 19.
{{sum|Reasonable}}
[[Energy return on investment]] (EROI): About 19.


In other words: wind turbines, over their entire lifespan, produce about 19 times as much energy as it takes to make them.<ref>Hall, C., et al. (2013) EROI of different fuels and the implications for society. Energy Policy (64), 141-152.</ref> There would still need to be some [[fossil fuels]] invested into wind power to "get the ball rolling".
In other words: wind turbines, over their entire lifespan, produce about 19 times as much energy as it takes to make them.<ref>Hall, C., et al. (2013) EROI of different fuels and the implications for society. Energy Policy (64), 141-152.</ref> There would still need to be some [[fossil fuels]] invested into wind power to "get the ball rolling".
Line 139: Line 123:
Maybe there are some other wind turbine designs that have a better EROI. {{rn}}
Maybe there are some other wind turbine designs that have a better EROI. {{rn}}


===Land use===
==Land use==
{{sum|Reasonable}}
Per unit of energy, wind needs far more [[land]] than solar{{x|in terms of the spacing between the wind turbines; not in terms of the footing size of the turbines}}. However, wind turbines can coexist with farm land{{x|whether crop land or pasture}}, without interfering with [[crop yields]]. Crop land alone might provide enough space for enough wind turbines to meet global energy demands:
Per unit of energy, wind needs far more [[land]] than solar{{x|in terms of the spacing between the wind turbines; not in terms of the footing size of the turbines}}. However, wind turbines can coexist with farm land{{x|whether crop land or pasture}}, without interfering with [[crop yields]]. Crop land alone might provide enough space for enough wind turbines to meet global energy demands:
{{dp
{{dp
Line 193: Line 178:
There should be '''no need''' to destroy natural habitats to build wind farms.
There should be '''no need''' to destroy natural habitats to build wind farms.


===Noise===
==Noise==
{{sum|{{rn}} }}
{{empty}}
 
==Bird deaths==
{{sum|{{rn}} }}
{{empty}}
{{empty}}


===Recyclability===
==Recyclability==
{{sum|{{rn}} }}
{{empty}}
{{empty}}