Passenger emissions metrics
Is it better to travel by car, bus, plane or train? A common approach would be to look at the average "carbon emissions per passenger kilometer" for each mode of transportation. But if we want a fair comparison, we have to make sure they are all calculated the same way:
Two ways to calculate:
- A. Assume the vehicle is packed with some arbitrary number of people. Divide the vehicle's fuel economy by that number.
- B. Look at the total yearly emissions of the
bus companyairlinetrain system , and divide it by the total yearly passenger kilometers traveled by all its customers.
'A' tends to be optimistic. 'B' tends to be realistic or pessimistic.
Why the difference, you ask? Because, for example, a bus full of people can be quite fuel-efficient (good by 'A'), but that doesn't help much if the bus company also has to send a lot of buses that don't often get filled (bad by 'B').
Why this matters
For informed consumer choices
I've been trying to get an honest evaluation of which modes of transport are really greener. But if I just compile a table of "carbon emissions per passenger kilometer", there's no guarantee that it's a proper comparison. What if some of the data points were obtained by methodology 'A', and some by methodology 'B'? What if the cited sources
For systemic changes
It's possible that
This of course would be terrible customer service. It also might even go against government policy in some countries. But if the status-quo carbon emissions are bad enough, maybe the companies should just do it anyway (first lobbying to change whatever policies get in the way). Even if all the customers lost