Nuclear power: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Types==
==Types==
<!--
* '''[[Conventional nuclear power]]''' - '''status quo''', used by all nuclear power plants today
* '''[[Conventional nuclear power]]''' - '''status quo''', used by all nuclear power plants today
* [[Breeder reactors]] {{light|(thorium or uranium)}} - not ''quite'' viable yet
* [[Breeder reactors]] {{light|(thorium or uranium)}} - not ''quite'' viable yet
* [[Nuclear fusion]] - not viable yet
* [[Nuclear fusion]] - not viable yet
-->
{|class='wikitable'
!rowspan='2' |Type
!colspan='3' |Problems if scaled up
|-
!Fuel scarcity
!Weapons proliferation
!Nuclear waste
|-
|[[Conventional nuclear power]]
|{{rcell}} Yes
|No
|{{rcell}} Yes
|-
|[[Small nuclear reactors]]
|{{rcell}} Yes
|{{rcell}} Yes
|{{rcell}} Yes
|-
|Uranium-238 [[breeder reactors]]
|No
|{{rcell}} Yes
|No
|-
|[[Thorium]]-232 breeder reactors
|No
|No
|No
|-
|Hydrogen [[fusion]] {{light|(not viable yet)}}
|No
|No
|No
|}
So far, it seems that '''[[thorium]]''' is the only nuclear power that could really scale up enough to replace all [[fossil fuels]].


[[Category:Energy sources]]
[[Category:Energy sources]]