Energy storage: Difference between revisions

Line 163: Line 163:


Not viable.
Not viable.
Solutions:
* Using some other version of lithium-ion batteries, which doesn't depend so much on cobalt.
* Marketing cheaper electric vehicles with much smaller battery capacity, for city driving only.
* [[Walkability]].
* Extracting [[lithium from seawater]] (the viability of this may be questionable).
Other important stats:
{{dp
|<nowiki>li_ion.charge_discharge_efficiency</nowiki>
|<nowiki>85%</nowiki>
|<nowiki>When you charge a lithium-ion battery, this much of the energy is stored. The rest is lost as heat.</nowiki>
|<nowiki>Range: 80 to 90 %</nowiki><br /><nowiki>
from wikipedia; haven't found original source yet</nowiki>
}}
{{calc
|<nowiki> li_ion.charge_discharge_efficiency </nowiki>
|<nowiki>%</nowiki>
}}


===Iron-redox flow batteries===
===Iron-redox flow batteries===