Energy: Difference between revisions

31 bytes added ,  31 May 2022
Line 37: Line 37:


==Energy demand==
==Energy demand==
[[File: energy-demand-status-quo.png|border|alt=Energy uses]]
Categorized by end use:<br>
 
[[File: energy-demand-status-quo.png|border|alt=Energy uses]]<br />
But this is the ''status quo'', with most of the world currently living in poverty.
 
Suppose every country was as "developed" as "western" countries: global energy demand would be more than double:
 
[[File: energy-demand-if-first-world.png|border|alt=Energy demand if everyone lived a first-world lifestyle]]
 
Wondering where these numbers come from? Read [[energy demand scenarios]].
 
===Can this demand (or at least, most of it) be met without fossil fuels?===
===Can this demand (or at least, most of it) be met without fossil fuels?===
Short answer: No.
Short answer: No.


Long answer: Not without [[energy supply scenarios|major technological breakthroughs]].
Long answer: Not without [[energy supply scenarios|major technological breakthroughs]].


====But there is good news:====
Even worse: Most of the world is currently living in '''poverty'''. Suppose every country was as ''developed'' as ''western'' countries: [[energy demand scenarios|Global energy demand would be more than '''double''']]:
 
[[File: energy-demand-if-developed.png|border|alt=Energy demand if everyone lived a first-world lifestyle]]
 
====But there is good news====


If we [[minimal consumption scenario|did things differently]], then...
If we [[minimal consumption scenario|did things differently]], then...
* everyone on the planet could have a decent quality of life, and
* Everyone on the planet could have a decent quality of life, and
* energy consumption would be just a fraction of what it is today.
* Energy consumption would be just a fraction of what it is today.
[[minimal consumption scenario|This is probably the most viable route to net-zero carbon emissions]].
* Plus, people would be less [[labor|overworked]].
[[minimal consumption scenario|This might actually be the most viable route to net-zero carbon emissions]].