Energy storage: Difference between revisions

From the change wiki
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
<small>Note: This page does not include [[thermal energy storage]].</small>
<small>Note: This page does not include [[thermal energy storage]].</small>


==Types==
==Types / Candidates==
{|class="wikitable"
{|class="wikitable"
!Type
!Type
Line 56: Line 56:
So far, sodium-based batteries seem to have the most hope of being a widespread solution - along with iron-based batteries for stationary energy storage.
So far, sodium-based batteries seem to have the most hope of being a widespread solution - along with iron-based batteries for stationary energy storage.


<!--
==How much energy storage might be needed?==
==How much energy storage might be needed?==
Some quick estimates:
Some quick estimates:
Line 107: Line 108:
There are more options for this type of energy storage, because it's stationary (not moving in a vehicle).
There are more options for this type of energy storage, because it's stationary (not moving in a vehicle).


These numbers might be reused on other wikipages to assess the large-scale viability of various types of energy storage. Don't worry if you're not familiar with <code>terajoules</code> as an [[energy/units|energy unit]].


<!-- TODO: add better estimates.
 
    NOTE: when these numbers change, also update the calculations on the pages for each energy storage type.
TODO:
    TALK: if a lot of calculations have to be reused in a lot of pages, consider creating a template
* Improve the above commented-out calculations.
* Put them in templates {{Grid energy storage}} and {{Vehicle energy storage}}
* Use the templates on the wikipage of each energy storage type.
-->
-->
These numbers might be reused on other wikipages to assess the large-scale viability of various types of energy storage. Don't worry if you're not familiar with <code>terajoules</code> as an [[energy/units|energy unit]].

Revision as of 13:02, 2 September 2023

In the pursuit of green energy, storage is needed for 2 reasons:

  1. To smooth out the intermittency of solar and wind power.
  2. To store energy in electric vehicles.

Note: This page does not include thermal energy storage.

Types / Candidates

Type Status
Sodium-ion batteries Good potential / needs investment.
Sodium-sulfur batteries Good potential / needs investment.
Hydrogen gas Okay for some applications, but too lossy and platinum-intensive for others.
Lithium ferrous (iron) phosphate Okay if used in moderation. A bit too lithium-intensive to be a general solution.
Lithium-ion batteries Not scalable enough: Too cobalt-intensive.
Lithium-sulfur batteries Can't handle enough charge cycles.
Lead-acid batteries Toxic / hazardous.
Stationary storage only (power grid, not vehicles)
Iron redox flow batteries Good potential / needs investment.
Compressed air ?
Pumped hydro Only viable in rare geographical locations.
Flywheels ?
Gravity blocks Not viable: Outrageously high environmental footprint of construction.

For more details, read the wikipage of each energy storage type. Links are in the table.

So far, sodium-based batteries seem to have the most hope of being a widespread solution - along with iron-based batteries for stationary energy storage.