Energy storage: Difference between revisions
(→Types) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<small>Note: This page does not include [[thermal energy storage]].</small> | <small>Note: This page does not include [[thermal energy storage]].</small> | ||
==Types== | ==Types / Candidates== | ||
{|class="wikitable" | {|class="wikitable" | ||
!Type | !Type | ||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
So far, sodium-based batteries seem to have the most hope of being a widespread solution - along with iron-based batteries for stationary energy storage. | So far, sodium-based batteries seem to have the most hope of being a widespread solution - along with iron-based batteries for stationary energy storage. | ||
<!-- | |||
==How much energy storage might be needed?== | ==How much energy storage might be needed?== | ||
Some quick estimates: | Some quick estimates: | ||
Line 107: | Line 108: | ||
There are more options for this type of energy storage, because it's stationary (not moving in a vehicle). | There are more options for this type of energy storage, because it's stationary (not moving in a vehicle). | ||
These numbers might be reused on other wikipages to assess the large-scale viability of various types of energy storage. Don't worry if you're not familiar with <code>terajoules</code> as an [[energy/units|energy unit]]. | |||
TODO: | |||
* Improve the above commented-out calculations. | |||
* Put them in templates {{Grid energy storage}} and {{Vehicle energy storage}} | |||
* Use the templates on the wikipage of each energy storage type. | |||
--> | --> | ||
Revision as of 13:02, 2 September 2023
In the pursuit of green energy, storage is needed for 2 reasons:
- To smooth out the intermittency of solar and wind power.
- To store energy in electric vehicles.
Note: This page does not include thermal energy storage.
Types / Candidates
Type | Status |
---|---|
Sodium-ion batteries | Good potential / needs investment. |
Sodium-sulfur batteries | Good potential / needs investment. |
Hydrogen gas | Okay for some applications, but too lossy and platinum-intensive for others. |
Lithium ferrous (iron) phosphate | Okay if used in moderation. A bit too lithium-intensive to be a general solution. |
Lithium-ion batteries | Not scalable enough: Too cobalt-intensive. |
Lithium-sulfur batteries | Can't handle enough charge cycles. |
Lead-acid batteries | Toxic / hazardous. |
Stationary storage only (power grid, not vehicles) | |
Iron redox flow batteries | Good potential / needs investment. |
Compressed air | ? |
Pumped hydro | Only viable in rare geographical locations. |
Flywheels | ? |
Gravity blocks | Not viable: Outrageously high environmental footprint of construction. |
For more details, read the wikipage of each energy storage type. Links are in the table.
So far, sodium-based batteries seem to have the most hope of being a widespread solution - along with iron-based batteries for stationary energy storage.