Housing/Canada: Difference between revisions

From the change wiki
Line 4: Line 4:


{|class="wikitable"
{|class="wikitable"
!colspan="2"|Supply
|''code''
|''count''
|''definition''
|-
|-
|studio
!colspan="3"|Supply
|-
|st
|132060
|132060
|studio unit
|-
|-
|1-bedroom
|1b
|2124485
|2124485
|1-bedroom unit
|-
|-
|2-bedroom
|2b
|3829965
|3829965
|2-bedroom unit
|-
|-
|3-bedroom
|3b
|4982900
|4982900
|3-bedroom unit
|-
|-
|4b
|3909525
|4-bedroom or more
|4-bedroom or more
|3909525
|-
|-
!colspan="2"|Demand
!colspan="3"|Demand
|-
|-
|s0
|6850005
|Singles with '''no''' children
|Singles with '''no''' children
|6850005
|-
|-
|c0
|4286165
|Couples with '''no''' children
|Couples with '''no''' children
|4286165
|-
|-
|s1
|1019940
|Single parents with '''1''' child
|Single parents with '''1''' child
|1019940
|-
|-
|c1+
|4290420
|Couples with '''1 or more''' children
|Couples with '''1 or more''' children
|4290420
|-
|-
|s2+
|666400
|Single parents with '''2 or more''' children
|Single parents with '''2 or more''' children
|666400
|}
|}
<small>Data source: <cite>Canadian Census 2021</cite> https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2021/dp-pd/prof/details/page.cfm?Lang=E&GENDERlist=1,2,3&STATISTIClist=1&HEADERlist=0&DGUIDlist=2021A000011124&SearchText=Canada<!-- TODO: upload the spreadsheet with the formulas that calculated these numbers --></small>
<small>Data source: <cite>Canadian Census 2021</cite> https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2021/dp-pd/prof/details/page.cfm?Lang=E&GENDERlist=1,2,3&STATISTIClist=1&HEADERlist=0&DGUIDlist=2021A000011124&SearchText=Canada<!-- TODO: upload the spreadsheet with the formulas that calculated these numbers --></small>


The '''Supply''' includes all types of housing - including apartments, condos, townhouses and single-detached houses. Categorized by the number of bedrooms.
The '''Supply''' includes all types of housing - including apartments, condos, townhouses and houses. Categorized by the number of bedrooms.
 
<!-- TODO: turn the table into a bar graph -->
<!-- XXX: maybe include vacant units as a separate column in the above table, and add them in a lighter-but-similar color for each unit type in the bar graph? i can only do this if there is data on the number of bedrooms in vacant units -->
<!-- TODO: make another table/graph with the same data shown as people and bedrooms.
- be sure to show the total number of bedrooms and the total population
- categorize people as "single", "in a couple with no children", "in a family of 2 (single parent + child)" "in a family of 3 (parent(s) + child(ren))", "in a family of 4 or more (parent(s) + children)"
- categorize bedrooms as "studio", "in a 1-bedroom unit", "in a 2-bedroom unit", "in a 3-bedroom unit", "in a 4-or-more-bedroom unit", "in a vacant unit (number of bedrooms estimated)"
- clarify again that units can be apartments or condos or houses etc.
-->


<!-- DRAFT:
The first thing to notice is there are a lot of single adults {{x|and also a lot of childless couples}}, and not very much single-person housing {{x|and also not enough housing made for childless couples}}. Thus, most singles end up either...
The first thing to notice is there are a lot of single people {{x|and couples with no kids}}, and not very much single-person housing {{x|and not much 'childless couple'-sized housing either}}. This leads to "forever compromising" in a few ways:
* Living with roommates. {{x|In some cases, there is no other option but to find roommates on semi-anonymous websites. This comes with safety issues and difficulty trusting whether the roommate will even pay their part of the rent.}}
* Having to live with roommates - in many cases, no other option but to meet roommates as strangers on Craigslist, which may lead to trust problems or rent defaulting where one person has to bare the burden
* Living with parents, even in adulthood. {{x|Some of these single adults may not even be counted "s0" statistic above - some might be counted as "children" in families. The Canadian census defines "child" in a way that has no age cutoff.}}
* Having to live with parents, even in adulthood
* Hastily moving in with someone they ''just started dating'', before really knowing whether it's right.
* Pressure to hastily enter romantic relationships due to the need for housing
* Living alone in a bigger, and more expensive place than needed.
* Living alone in a place bigger and more expensive than one would otherwise need.


The last one also takes away housing from families.
The last one also takes away housing from families.


Solutions:
Solutions:
* subdividing apartments into studios
* [[subdividing]] apartments into studios
* subdividing suburban houses into duplexes
* [[subdividing]] suburban houses into duplexes
Nuances:
Nuances:
* obviously this doesn't mean subdividing ALL the homes - just enough to meet the demand for housing for all the childless people.
* Obviously this doesn't mean subdividing ALL the homes - just enough to meet the demand.
* let's be clear - this wouldn't take housing away from families. It would make more housing available to families. Maybe I need to draw some sort of diagram so people can understand why.
* Subdivision would ''not'' take housing away from families. It would make ''more'' housing available to families. {{p2|(see why)|Many of today's family-sized houses are inhabited by single adults who ''would'' sell their home and move into something smaller (i.e. 1-bedroom condo), but can't find an affordable one (because as the table shows, there simply aren't enough - today's high prices are the market's way of signalling that). By subdividing a few family-sized houses into three 1-bedroom condos, these single adults would move there, freeing up the other family-sized houses for families. Sorry if any of this seems unclear - I'll make a diagram soon.}}
-->
 
<!-- TODO: ==Custom region== : provide instructions how to use the spreadsheet in regional other data. discuss future plans for making this easier -->
<!-- TODO: ==Custom region== : upload the spreadsheet I used for ==All of Canada==, and provide some minimal instructions how to use it for other regions -->
 
==More considerations==
 
<q>More than 235,000 people in Canada experience homelessness in any given year, and 25,000 to 35,000 people may be experiencing homelessness on any given night.</q> - [https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/82-003-x/2021001/article/00002-eng.htm]
 
The census data used earlier, doesn't include ''vacant'' homes. A quick estimate is that 1.3 million homes are vacant, or 8% of the [[housing]] stock. [https://betterdwelling.com/new-data-shows-canada-still-has-1-3-million-vacant-homes-some-improvements-seen/]
 
Also not included: [[office]] buildings, which ''could'' be [[Commercial to residential|repurposed into housing as well]].
 
''You can help expand this page by joining the {{talk}}.''

Revision as of 20:16, 28 October 2022

Does Canada have enough housing? Let's do a housing supply analysis using census data.

All of Canada

code count definition
Supply
st 132060 studio unit
1b 2124485 1-bedroom unit
2b 3829965 2-bedroom unit
3b 4982900 3-bedroom unit
4b 3909525 4-bedroom or more
Demand
s0 6850005 Singles with no children
c0 4286165 Couples with no children
s1 1019940 Single parents with 1 child
c1+ 4290420 Couples with 1 or more children
s2+ 666400 Single parents with 2 or more children

Data source: Canadian Census 2021 https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2021/dp-pd/prof/details/page.cfm?Lang=E&GENDERlist=1,2,3&STATISTIClist=1&HEADERlist=0&DGUIDlist=2021A000011124&SearchText=Canada

The Supply includes all types of housing - including apartments, condos, townhouses and houses. Categorized by the number of bedrooms.


The first thing to notice is there are a lot of single adults (...)( and also a lot of childless couples ), and not very much single-person housing (...)( and also not enough housing made for childless couples ). Thus, most singles end up either...

  • Living with roommates. (...)( In some cases, there is no other option but to find roommates on semi-anonymous websites. This comes with safety issues and difficulty trusting whether the roommate will even pay their part of the rent. )
  • Living with parents, even in adulthood. (...)( Some of these single adults may not even be counted "s0" statistic above - some might be counted as "children" in families. The Canadian census defines "child" in a way that has no age cutoff. )
  • Hastily moving in with someone they just started dating, before really knowing whether it's right.
  • Living alone in a bigger, and more expensive place than needed.

The last one also takes away housing from families.

Solutions:

Nuances:

  • Obviously this doesn't mean subdividing ALL the homes - just enough to meet the demand.
  • Subdivision would not take housing away from families. It would make more housing available to families. (see why)Many of today's family-sized houses are inhabited by single adults who would sell their home and move into something smaller (i.e. 1-bedroom condo), but can't find an affordable one (because as the table shows, there simply aren't enough - today's high prices are the market's way of signalling that). By subdividing a few family-sized houses into three 1-bedroom condos, these single adults would move there, freeing up the other family-sized houses for families. Sorry if any of this seems unclear - I'll make a diagram soon.


More considerations

More than 235,000 people in Canada experience homelessness in any given year, and 25,000 to 35,000 people may be experiencing homelessness on any given night. - [1]

The census data used earlier, doesn't include vacant homes. A quick estimate is that 1.3 million homes are vacant, or 8% of the housing stock. [2]

Also not included: office buildings, which could be repurposed into housing as well.

You can help expand this page by joining the discussion.