Walkability: Difference between revisions

2,478 bytes added ,  1 June 2023
no edit summary
(Created page with "# Transportation is a major contributor to climate change. # Electric vehicles may not a Term:viable solution soon enough. # In many parts of the world, neighborhoods are designed in a way that forces us to drive a lot. But there is good news: '''We can fix this.''' ==Small tweaks, big changes== ... ==New construction== The energy potentially saved by building brand new walkable neighborhoods, has to be weighed against the energy it takes to construct them.")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
# Transportation is a major contributor to [[climate change]].
A '''walkable''' neighborhood has most of what people need within walking distance from [[housing|home]].
# [[Electric vehicles]] may not a [[Term:viable|viable]] solution soon enough.
# In many parts of the world, neighborhoods are designed in a way that forces us to drive a lot. But there is good news: '''We can fix this.'''


==Small tweaks, big changes==
{{minor|Walkability is a continuum. It's unlikely for a neighborhood to have ''everything'' for ''everyone'', but the more it has, the less people have to drive or use [[public transit]].}}


...
==Things worth having within walking distance==
* [[Food|Groceries]] and other stores
* [[Education|Schools]]
* [[Green space|Parks]]
* Recreation centers
* Places where people [[Labor|work]], in general
* Outdoor public spaces for events & festivals


==New construction==
{{minor|''Got something to be add to this list? Join the {{talk}}.''}}


The energy potentially saved by building brand new walkable neighborhoods, has to be weighed against the energy it takes to construct them.
The goal is to have a neighborhood that people can actually enjoy spending time in, and not just at home.
 
 
==Motivations for walkability==
* Transportation is a major contributor to [[climate change]].
* [[Electric vehicles]] may not be a [[Term:viable|viable]] solution soon enough.
* In many parts of the world, neighborhoods are designed in a way that forces us to drive a lot.
 
 
==Tradeoffs of new construction==
Although walkability could save [[energy]] by decreasing reliance on transportation, this has to be weighed against the energy footprint of constructing brand new buildings to make walkable areas.
 
A much better solution is to repurpose existing space as much as possible.
 
==Repurposing existing space==
===Suburbs===
The majority of people in USA & Canada live in suburbs that are very ''not'' walkable.
{{minor|This was originally by design, due to automobile companies lobbying for specific policy decisions made back in the 1950s. Many of the policies are unfortunately still in place, as [[zoning]] laws.}}
 
Although it's hard to have true walkability if a suburb's density is low, there are still '''improvements''' to be made:
* Commercial space
** Repeal some [[zoning]] laws: Allow homeowners to run small businesses from their homes. Most homeowners wouldn't, but there'd be a few enterprising folks who might [[residential to commercial|turn part of their house]] into a small grocery store, or coffee shop, or yoga studio, or whatever else you'd typically see in less-suburban areas.
*** In some cases, someone might buy a house specifically to repurpose it into a small business. This could be good in moderation but would be a problem if too many investors did it (a big concern for the first neighborhoods to try such a policy). So there would need to be policies ''limiting'' this. Also, any decrease in housing should be offset in other ways.
** Office space
*** People are increasingly working from home.
* Public events
** Use part of a park (suburbs usually have a lot of them) as a "public square"
* [[Housing]] density
** [[Subdividing]] some houses into duplexes. Good for walkability - and even more importantly, helps alleviate the housing shortage. Note: This doesn't mean subdividing ''all'' houses, just some percentage of vacant ones.
<!-- UNPLACED NOTE: bring back "coach houses" {{npn}} -->