Rooftop solar

From the change wiki

Rooftops are a good place to put solar panels, because:

  • They are close to where the energy is typically used.
  • They need no extra land (unlike solar farms). That's an environmental footprint avoided.


Summary:

  • In most cases, rooftop solar could provide enough energy for homes, other buildings, and charging electric vehicles.
    • Exception: heating in cold parts of the world
    • Exception: high-density cities
    • Note: People would have to charge their electric vehicles during the day.
  • Hard problems:

Potential

First let's estimate how much rooftop area is available globally. For lack of better data, let's just assume that rooftops (...)( more precisely: the surface area of all suitable rooftops combined ) are 1/4 of all "urban and built-up land" area. This assumption isn't perfect (...)( For one, there may be a lot of homes with rooftops that can't support the weight of solar panels - especially in the global south. Hopefully this problem could be mitigated with more lightweight solar panels. Well if the 1/4 turns out to be an overestimate, it still might be offset by the possibility of other suitable locations to install solar panels on built-up land. However, solar roadways are of questionable viability. ) but hopefully it's good enough.

built_up_land
1500000 km^2
Urban land, suburbs, industrial areas - global total
This is home to the vast majority of people on Earth.


Does not include most farm land.

https://ourworldindata.org/land-use

(1/4) built_up_land km^2 (calculation loading)

Assume we find a way to manufacture this many solar panels without overrunning our mineral reserves. How much energy could we generate?

solar_panel.efficiency
17%
Efficiency of an average solar panel
Some solar panels are more efficient than this, but they tend to be expensive and contain more rare metals.
sunlight_average
200 watts per m^2
Solar irradiance, averaged over a whole year INCLUDING nights, cloudy days, etc.
Note: This varies by region.
https://www.newport.com/t/introduction-to-solar-radiation
http://www.ftexploring.com/solar-energy/insolation.htm
energy.tfc
9937.70 Mtoe/year
Global energy usage - total final consumption (TFC)
Includes: fuel (80.7%) + electricity (19.3%) AFTER it is generated.

Does not include the fuel used in generating electricity. See [energy.tes] for that.

Citation: "Key World Energy Statistics 2020" IEA
- Page 47 - Simplified energy balance table - World energy balance, 2018

(1/4) built_up_land * solar_panel.efficiency * sunlight_average % energy.tfc (calculation loading)


In simple terms, this means we could just about meet the world's energy demand, with solar alone. [''']Less energy would be available if the solar panels were less efficient due to using fewer minerals.

Energy demand could also decrease, given certain factors:
- walkability and public transit
- voluntary frugalism in the western world especially
- electric vehicles as long as they don't take too much energy to manufacture

Energy demand could also increase, given other factors:
- more nations becoming 'developed' in a way that copies the current western world

For all intents and purposes, let's assume that all these factors would balance each other out, roughly.

However, some of the energy might be generated in the wrong places. Low-density cities/towns may generate too much; high-density cities may not generate enough.

Locality

High-rise buildings don't have enough rooftop surface to power the whole building. But in some cases, a dense inner-city could be powered by excess energy from suburban house rooftops nearby. In what cases is this viable? Population density could be a useful measuring stick:

(1/4) sunlight_average * solar_panel.efficiency / (2000 watts per capita) people per km^2 (calculation loading)

^ If your whole municipality's population density is greater than this number, you would probably need solar farms. (...)( And of course it also depends on how much energy people use; in this estimate we're assuming 2000 watts per capita, which is hopefully enough for a modern life - especially if living in a high rise. )

Charging electric vehicles

If we assume one electric car per house, we'd need to add another 543 watts (...)( Note: This is power averaged over time. Peak power would be significantly higher, but that's not a big deal as vehicles could be charged during peak sunlight. ) per household:

average_us_vehicle.mileage_by_time
32 miles/day
Distance driven by the average American vehicle
Top Numbers Driving America's Gasoline Demand
https://www.api.org/news-policy-and-issues/blog/2022/05/26/top-numbers-driving-americas-gasoline-demand
electric_car.efficiency
100 miles per 34.6 kWh
The "gas mileage" equivalent for an average electric car.
Average Electric Car kWh Per Mile [Results From 231 EVs]
ecocostsavings.com › average-electric-car-kwh-per-mile
li_ion.charge_discharge_efficiency
85%
When you charge a lithium-ion battery, this much of the energy can be recovered. The rest is lost as heat.
Range: 80 to 90 %
from wikipedia; haven't found original source yet

average_us_vehicle.mileage_by_time / electric_car.efficiency / li_ion.charge_discharge_efficiency watts (calculation loading) Would the average suburban rooftop be able to provide this?

1000 square(feet) * sunlight_average * solar_panel.efficiency watts (calculation loading) Yes, seems doable. Obviously it depends on the size of the rooftop (in this example, we assume 1000 square feet). (...)( If we factor in all the car owners in dense cities, it might become less viable. Good thing dense areas are good candidates for walkability. )

Energy storage

So far we've looked at watts averaged over time, but actual raw watts are much higher during the day, and almost zero at night. We need energy storage to smooth things out.

As a bare minimum, a house should at least have nighttime electricity for lights, appliances, cooking, computers, entertainment, etc. Assume we need to store about 12 hours of average-case power consumption (...)( obviously this also depends on a lot of factors, such as time-of-year and consumption patterns. Let's do a generous estimate that assumes that heating doesn't need to be done at night, as heat can be stored in other ways much cheaper than batteries. ) for that:

usa.residential_essential_baseload
641 billion kWh/year
Bare minimum residential electricity that must be available 24/7, in the USA
Does not include heating/cooling, because there are ways to store warmth/cold more cheaply than storing electricity.

Source: https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=96&t=3

Using rows in table: "Total consumption", minus "Space cooling", minus "Space heating", minus "Water heating", minus exactly 1/2 of "Other uses".
Note: This can be understood as ''average power''. The required ''peak power'' may be higher, as this consumption may be concentrated into afternoon/evening hours.
usa.homes
142153010
Number of households in the USA
Includes houses, apartments, condos and more.

Housing units - U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts: United States
[https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/VET605221]

12 hours usa.residential_essential_baseload / usa.homes kWh (calculation loading)

Electric vehicles already contain energy storage. Best-case scenario, people charge them during the day. (...)( People would be motivated by the massive price difference between daytime electricity (incredibly cheap) and nighttime electricity. Daytime charging comes with a few other logistical challenges, but it still has the potential to become a social norm. )

Safety

  • The roof needs to be able to support the weight of the solar panels.
  • Installing the panels, without the proper skills and knowledge, could result in electrocution or fire hazards.
    • Maybe this risk could be mitigated with enough engineering: Could rooftop solar kits be designed to be user-friendly and safe enough for non-professionals to install them?[RESEARCH needed]

Challanges

  • Some roofs might be more suited for solar panels than others.[RESEARCH needed]
  • Installation might need very specialized labor.[RESEARCH needed]
  • Keeping snow & ice off the panels
  • Making solar panels cheaper, more lightweight, less demanding of rare minerals. This is generally at odds with having more efficient solar panels.[RESEARCH needed]
  • Environmental tradeoffs for houses that are surrounded by tall trees

Combined photovoltaic and thermal panels

Solar thermal panels use the sun to directly heat water & air, without electricity as an intermediate. There are some designs that integrate with photovoltaics, to really make the most of the sun for both heating and electricity. But in which weather conditions is this viable - would it still work in colder winters?[RESEARCH needed] How does it compare to pure photovoltaics combined with heat pumps?

Factories

Factories make up a significant share of global energy demand - more than homes and other buildings. Factories could also mostly run only during the day to make use of peak solar energy without much need for energy storage. But could a factory's rooftop provide most of energy needed to power the factory?[RESEARCH needed]

If not, there may be other solutions:

  • If the factory is near a city with many houses producing excess energy from their rooftops during the day, the factory could use that as an energy source.
  • If the factory is far from cities, it might happen to be in an area where wind power is viable.
  • Perhaps the factory could scale down and decentralize production. Beware of caveat: (...)( This could easily be overall worse for the environment if existing factory equipment has to be abandoned in favor of smaller equipment to be built from scratch. But there are probably some cases where this wouldn't have to happen. )

See also: Solar powered factories

External links