Draft:Solutions summary 1

From the change wiki
Revision as of 01:42, 24 December 2023 by Elie (talk | contribs) (Created page with "<pre class="levels"> Most of the world's energy today comes from fossil fuels. To change this, the following tech is needed: Energy storage, especially Sodium-ion batteries Reason: Because lithium-ion is too mineral-intensive to scale up. To be used for mid-range electric vehicles and smoothing out the day-night cycle of solar panels. They don't even have to be as energy dense as lithium-ion. [...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Most of the world's [[energy]] today comes from [[fossil fuels]]. To change this, the following tech is needed:
 [[Energy storage]], especially
  [[Sodium-ion batteries]]
       Reason: Because lithium-ion is [[lithium-ion#battery minerals|too mineral-intensive to scale up]].
   To be used for mid-range [[electric vehicles]] and smoothing out the day-night cycle of [[solar panels]].
   They don't even have to be as energy dense as [[lithium-ion]].
 [[Energy sources]] - some combination of
  [[Solar panels without scarce minerals]]
       Reason: Most of today's [[solar panels]] on the market are [[solar panel minerals|too mineral-intensive to scale up]].
   To be installed on as many [[rooftop solar|rooftops]] as possible.
      This could provide enough "general-purpose" electricity for homes, buildings and [[EVs]], but not enough for [[heating]] in cold parts of the world.
  [[Wind turbines]]
   Mostly for producing [[hydrogen gas]]
    Can later be burned for [[heating]] buildings and in [[hydrogen combustion vehicles|vehicles]]
        [[Fuel cell vehicles]] are too platinum/palladium-intensive to scale up, but hydrogen production [[hydrogen gas#platinum-group metals|is not]].
   During local windy seasons, can also be used for electricity directly.
  [[Thorium power]]
     Note that other forms of [[nuclear]] are not viable to scale up
      [[Conventional nuclear power]] uses too much uranium-235 (too scarce)
      Uranium-238 [[breeder reactors]] have too many weapons proliferation concerns
      [[Nuclear fusion]] probably won't be viable soon enough, even though it'll ultimately be the best option in the distant future.

Until the above tech is ready, developed countries must reduce [[energy demand]] - most effectively by...
 Driving less
  Individual action: Walk, bike, or use [[public transit]].
  Collective action: Making neighborhoods more [[walkabile]] and improving [[public transit]].
 Buying less new "stuff"
  Individual action: [[Frugalism]]
  Collective action: Fight against [[planned obsolescence]]
 Yes, these actions would have the most impact - see [[:File:energy-demand-pie1.png|this pie chart]].

Note that [[climate change]] isn't the ''only'' major environmental problem. There's also [[habitat loss]]. The most effective way to stop this is via [[food]]:
    Reason: Because agriculture uses more [[land]] than any other human activity.
 Stop [[food waste]]
  (both personal ''and'' business food waste)
 Make food more [[plant-based]]
  (both personal choices ''and'' systemic changes make a difference here)
 Yes, these actions make the biggest difference, both for the environment and for ending [[global hunger]].